Fxtec Pro1 Sample Shots (Compare with HMD Nokia 8.1)

Tagged: 

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #20517
    Waxberry
    Waxberry
    Keymaster
    Topics: 6
    Replies: 96
    Thanked: 459 times

    Real world sample shot of Fxtec Pro1 compared with Nokia 8.1, which has the same primary sensor of camera (Sony IMX363) and Nokia 8.1 has ZEISS certified.
    All photos are uncropped, unfiltered.
    Due to forum attachment size restriction, the pic shown here will be of a “screenshot”, with the original file uploaded into the link following.
    Please also note the camera software of Fxtec Pro1 is still WIP, there will be further improvements for the future. I will try to cover all the user circumstances, but some will come later.

    First: Daylight, sunshine in a green

    From Nokia 8.1:
    Nok1
    Original Pic: https://drive.google.com/open?id=16CDV1KGIh5zPm8csxsK-t_dq0Q15457i

    From Fxtec Pro1:
    Fx1
    Original Pic: https://drive.google.com/open?id=124h7etRp8x-jl85K1yHyg3GRfM1cMGti

    Attachments:
    12 users thanked author for this post.
    #20521
    Waxberry
    Waxberry
    Keymaster
    Topics: 6
    Replies: 96
    Thanked: 459 times

    Sample 2: Daylight, seaside
    From Nokia 8.1:
    Nok2
    Original: https://drive.google.com/open?id=19NyoK-TndTlGszrA78puF2xzF7S-g39v

    From Fxtec Pro1:
    Fx2
    Original: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uFnCJ_GIB0_DJTcGaV4MrCagi55x33xR

    Attachments:
    7 users thanked author for this post.
    #20525
    michael.bosscha
    Michael Bosscha
    Participant
    Topics: 2
    Replies: 49
    Thanked: 72 times

    Overall, the Pro1’s camera looks a bit lighter. I can’t say I dislike it…

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #20526
    Waxberry
    Waxberry
    Keymaster
    Topics: 6
    Replies: 96
    Thanked: 459 times

    Sample 3, Indoor with adequate light

    Nokia 8.1:
    Nok3
    Original: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1jdrnOmeupb_Whscw6q8Y_eCMpS8LEBnP

    Fxtec Pro1:
    Fx3
    Original:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KMutefqXz87JD-_ig2pqWOXBhreZUpKB

    Attachments:
    6 users thanked author for this post.
    #20529
    doktor.oswaldo
    doktor.oswaldo
    Participant
    Topics: 5
    Replies: 155
    Thanked: 219 times

    The first picture seems to be a little to bright, the second seems to be pretty good. In the third one the pro1 wins clearly.
    It surely seems the camera is already good enough for me in this state.
    It makes me optimistic that the camera is going to be pretty solid once it isn’t WIP anymore.

    But I am a pretty basic camera user, wouid love to hear the opinion of somebody who has actually an idea about what he is talking.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    #20547
    vitaliysemenko
    ddark-il
    Participant
    Topics: 0
    Replies: 16
    Thanked: 30 times

    The pics are comparable. Can’t say that FxTec is winner in all conditions – I prefer Nokia on third pic.

    I like that pictures aren’t over-sharpened as on Nokia, but I would prefer less saturation.
    Also I think that more tweaks needed on brightness/contrast side.

    We should wait for the final product, but even in current state, the quality is comparable with the big guys

    P.S. Flood the twitter with #shotonfxtec after phone released?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #20552
    sic_zer0
    netman
    Participant
    Topics: 5
    Replies: 179
    Thanked: 327 times

    Those are some great photos :). What I’d really like to know though is how close can the camera focus for macro(-ish) shots.

    In support of those who can’t access google drive because old browsers and the likes, I placed the samples also here: http://www.matland.be/pro1shots/ (I hope the fxtec team does not mind, please let me know)

    5 users thanked author for this post.
    #22709
    sic_zer0
    netman
    Participant
    Topics: 5
    Replies: 179
    Thanked: 327 times

    Just a thought, but i think this thread is worth being pinned :).

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #22719
    EskeRahn
    EskeRahn
    Keymaster
    Topics: 11
    Replies: 647
    Thanked: 876 times

    Just a thought, but i think this thread is worth being pinned :).

    Good point, done. :)

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #22730
    EskeRahn
    EskeRahn
    Keymaster
    Topics: 11
    Replies: 647
    Thanked: 876 times

    Those are some great photos :). What I’d really like to know though is how close can the camera focus for macro(-ish) shots.

    Flashed with the newest firmware, the pre-production unit (might be different from the real stuff), can do macros in Open Camera down to about 11.2×8.4cm, at about 9cm distance.

    5 users thanked author for this post.
    #22755
    david
    david
    Participant
    Topics: 3
    Replies: 78
    Thanked: 83 times

    Thanks @waxberry. Is the work-in-progress for the camera happening in the camera app that F(x)tec is supplying with the phone, or with drivers, or with hardware?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #22756
    david
    david
    Participant
    Topics: 3
    Replies: 78
    Thanked: 83 times

    Flashed with the newest firmware, the pre-production unit (might be different from the real stuff), can do macros in Open Camera down to about 11.2×8.4cm, at about 9cm distance.

    Did the photo quality and macro capabilities change for you in Open Camera from one version of the firmware to the next?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #22760
    sic_zer0
    netman
    Participant
    Topics: 5
    Replies: 179
    Thanked: 327 times

    Those are some great photos :). What I’d really like to know though is how close can the camera focus for macro(-ish) shots.

    Flashed with the newest firmware, the pre-production unit (might be different from the real stuff), can do macros in Open Camera down to about 11.2×8.4cm, at about 9cm distance.

    Well hey that’s pretty good, better than all my phones before :).

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    #22769
    Waxberry
    Waxberry
    Keymaster
    Topics: 6
    Replies: 96
    Thanked: 459 times

    Thanks @waxberry. Is the work-in-progress for the camera happening in the camera app that F(x)tec is supplying with the phone, or with drivers, or with hardware?

    Mainly with camera app and it’s algorithm. Hardware has been finalized already.

    7 users thanked author for this post.
    #22802
    EskeRahn
    EskeRahn
    Keymaster
    Topics: 11
    Replies: 647
    Thanked: 876 times

    Did the photo quality and macro capabilities change for you in Open Camera from one version of the firmware to the next?

    Oh indeed, the first firmware I had was very early. I did not even attempt to do macro on that…

    3 users thanked author for this post.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 21 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

© 2019 FX Technology Limited. Company Number 11602958